Montana Disability & Health Home Page | RTC: Rural | Rural Institute | The University of Montana | Publications | Resource Directory
Rural Disability and Rehabilitation
Research Progress Report #27
Characteristics of the Montana
Direct Service Labor Market
Research and Training Center on
Disability in Rural Communities,
The University of Montana Rural Institute
October, 2004
Background:
RTC: Rural researchers have documented the cost to Montana
developmental disability service providers of replacing, hiring and training
direct service
staff (Research Progress Report #17, 2002;
Research Progress Report #25, 2004).
Our
research also found a correlation between direct service staff turnover and
increased
incidence/costs of consumer injuries (Seekins, Traci & Szalda-Petree, 1999).
These
findings suggest that reducing turnover may improve consumers' well-being and
save
money. This report documents the next step in our economic assessment of direct
service staff turnover. The goal is improved health and well-being for adult
Montanans
who have intellectual and developmental disabilities and who live in supported
environments.
Methods:
In June, 2002, RTC: Rural researchers sent the Cost of Turnover to
Service
Corporations and Organizations Survey to 33 Montana community and institutional
service providers. Executive Directors and/or Human Resource Directors completed
the survey, which had been pilot-tested and developed with provider input
(Research
Progress Report #17, 2002). Thirteen community service providers and one state
intermediate care facility (ICF-MR) returned surveys (42% response rate). This
report is
based on the data provided by those 14 providers and compares local employment
and
wage levels for those service sectors that compete with providers for direct
service
staff.
Results:
Initial findings include:
1. Urban counties have larger labor markets and labor pools than rural counties;
2. Urban health and social services jobs pay higher wages than similar rural jobs;
3. Urban counties have lower unemployment rates than rural counties;
4. Health care sector jobs compete for direct service staff by generally paying higher wages than social service sector jobs.
Characteristics of Respondents' Labor Markets:
These data are for the counties
in
which respondents are located. Although Montana is mostly rural, the urban-rural
geographic distribution of the fourteen providers is representative of the whole
state.
Five providers are located in four urban counties with populations of 55,000 or
more
and large labor markets. Two providers share the same urban county. These urban
counties are regional trade and service centers serving western, northern,
central and
eastern Montana market areas of multiple surrounding counties. Nine providers
are
located in eight rural counties with smaller populations and a geographic
orientation
toward the urban trade centers. Two of the respondents share the same rural
county.
These rural counties represent every part of the state. Table 1 compares urban
and
rural unemployment rates, total numbers of jobs, and numbers of health and
social
services jobs in each provider's county.
Description of Table 1: Urban-Rural County Labor Market Characteristics (2001).
| 2001 County Employment Levels | |||
|
Unemployment Rate |
Total # Jobs | # Health Sector Jobs | # Social Service Jobs |
| Rural Counties (n = 8) | |||
| 3.2% | 1,272 | 256 | 62 |
| 4.4% | 1,315 | 153 | 56 |
| 2.6% | 3,356 | 413 | 46 |
| 3.0% | 4,755 | 564 | 216 |
| 4.5% | 9,698 | 865 | 193 |
| 11.4% | 4,091 | 56 | 31 |
| 4.6% | 5,219 | 456 | 89 |
| 3.5% | 2,561 | 357 | 109 |
|
Urban Counties (n = 4) |
|||
| 3.8% | 49,151 | 5,597 | 1,796 |
| 3.8% | 49,151 | 5,597 | 1,796 |
| 4.4% | 32,568 | 3,811 | 1,303 |
| 3.5% | 28,828 | 2,050 | 1,340 |
| 3.8% | 66,420 | 6,950 | 2,289 |
|
Source: Survey Data and Montana Department of Labor and Industry |
|||
Total regional employment is a measure of the number of workers available in a
local
labor market. Urban service providers operate in large labor markets with
thousands of
workers. Rural service providers operate in much smaller labor markets. Social
service
sector jobs are those that provide services to individuals and families, and to
individuals
in residential settings; these jobs are most similar to those of developmental
disabilities
direct service staff. The health sector is also a direct service employee labor
pool. With
retraining, many health care skills and job duties are transferable to direct
service
support of persons with developmental disabilities. However, health sector jobs
and
wages may also recruit direct service staff away from developmental disabilities
service
providers.
The local unemployment rate indicates a county's demand for labor. An urban
county
typically has lower unemployment rates because urban economies have more jobs
available. A high unemployment rate means sluggish demand for labor; job seekers
will
have difficulty finding work. Workers wanting to find or to change jobs will
have a tough
time in the rural county with an 11.4 percent unemployment rate.
Table 2 compares county-wide average wages, county health sector wages, and
wages
paid by each responding provider. It includes each provider's direct services
staff
turnover rate.
Description of Table 2: Urban-Rural County/Health Sector/Provider Wage Comparison; Providers' Direct Services Staff (DSS) Turnover Rates for 3-Month Period (2001)
| County Average Wage Rates | Provider Wage/DSS Turnover Rates | ||||
| All Jobs | Health Sector Jobs | Entry Level Wage Range | Total Turnover | ||
|
Rural Counties (n = 8) |
Rural Providers (n = 9) | ||||
| $8.80 | $8.20 | $6.00-11.40 | 10% | ||
| $9.30 | $8.11 | $6.05-6.75 | 11% | ||
| $10.25 | $11.58 | $7.83-14.27 | 6% | ||
| $10.80 | $14.52 | $8.00-10.00 | 0% | ||
| $11.02 | $11.50 | $7.80-8.30 | 11% | ||
| $11.83 | $11.23 | $7.00-10.00 | 0% | ||
| $9.85 | $12.94 | $8.10-8.85 | 8% | ||
| $10.80 | $14.52 | $7.10-7.61 | 2% | ||
| $10.28 | $13.09 | $6.00-11.60 | 0% | ||
|
Urban Counties (n = 4) |
Urban Providers |
||||
| $12.59 | $16.67 |
|
* |
40% | |
| $12.59 | $16.67 | $8.00-8.19 | 8% | ||
| $11.64 | $15.05 | $6.50-9.09 | 18% | ||
| $13.54 | $14.86 | $6.95-12.32 | 13% | ||
| $13.41 | $19.28 | $7.18-7.90 | 15% | ||
| Source: Survey Data and Montana Department of Labor and Industry; Note: * not reported | |||||
The urban counties have higher employment levels and wages; urban service
providers
must compete both for workers and with local wages. Urban workers with direct
service
skills and experience can command higher wages in the health service sector if
it is
hiring. Entry-level wages paid by the urban service providers are significantly
lower
than the prevailing wages of other sectors, especially the health sector. In one
urban
county, the difference between the service provider's range of direct service
entry-level
wages and health sector wages is more than $3/hr. In another urban county, it's
almost
$11/hr.
Urban service providers face tough challenges in hiring and retaining direct
service
staff. In the three-month period prior to completing the survey, urban providers
reported
higher average turnover rates for all full-time/part-time/substitute or relief
direct service
staff than rural providers. The highest three-month turnover rate was 40
percent.
Extrapolating this rate to a 12-month period means that this provider would
replace its
entire direct service staff in just over eight months.
Rural providers operated in counties with fewer total and health sector jobs.
Rural
wage levels were also lower so there was less difference between direct service
entry-level wages and other local wages. This smaller wage differential means
less
pressure for the rural service providers, although they still must maintain
staffing levels
and deal with staff turnover. Rural turnover rates per three-month period were
lower
(range of 0-11%) than urban rates. If the 11 percent turnover persisted for
one year, that provider would replace one-third of its direct service staff, a
significant
challenge in a rural county with a small pool of qualified workers.
Discussion:
These data demonstrate that there are complex reasons for direct
service
staff turnover and availability. Whether a direct service employee stays with a
provider
depends on the current economic environment, the size of the local labor pool,
the
number of local employers and competing jobs, and the local unemployment rate .
Each of these should be considered when structuring the direct service job
environment.
Next Steps:
We will analyze turnover rates related to provider/employee
characteristics:
entry-level wages, adequacy of management/supervision, benefit packages,
disability
levels of consumers, work experience, education and skill levels. We have
entered
detailed data from 243 full-time, part-time and relief direct service employees
employed
by six of the fourteen providers into a comprehensive database and will measure
their
job and personal characteristics as determinants of turnover.
Resources and References:
Bainbridge, D. & Brod, R. (2004). Montana Providers of Adult Developmental
Disabilities Living Services: Direct Service Staff Demographics, Job
Characteristics and
Job Satisfaction. Rural Rehabilitation Research Progress Report #26. Missoula:
The
University of Montana Rural Institute.
Seekins, T., Traci, M.A., & Szalda-Petree, A. (1999). Preventing and managing
secondary conditions experienced by people with disabilities: Roles for personal
assistance providers. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 22,
259-269.
Seninger, S. & Bainbridge, D. (2004). Montana Providers of Adult Developmental
Disabilities Living Services: Urban/Rural Characteristics, Direct Service Staff
Turnover
Rates and Replacement Costs. Rural Rehabilitation Research Progress Report #25.
Missoula: The University of Montana Rural Institute.
Seninger, S. & Traci, M. (2002). Rural Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Progress
Report #17: Analysis of Direct Care Staff Turnover: Preliminary Results and
Observations. Missoula: The University of Montana Rural Institute.
Traci, M., Szalda-Petree, A., & Seninger, S. (1999).
Turnover of personal
assistants
and the incidence of injury among adults with developmental disabilities: Rural
disability
and rehabilitation research progress report #3. Missoula: Montana University
Affiliated
Rural Institute on Disabilities.
For more information, contact:
Steve Seninger, PhD
The University of Montana Bureau of Business and Economic Research
Steve.Seninger@business.umt.edu
406-243-2725
Donna B. Bainbridge, PT, EdD, ATC, Director, Health Promotion for Adults with
Developmental Disabilities
dbridge@ruralinstitute.umt.edu
406-243-5741
Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities,
The University of Montana Rural Institute, 52 Corbin Hall, Missoula, MT
59812-7056
(888) 268-2743 toll-free, (406) 243-4200 (TTY), (406) 243-2349 FAX
rural@ruralinstitute.umt.edu
http://rtc.ruralinstitute.umt.edu
http://mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu
The information provided in this report was supported by grant #R04/CCR818822-02
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The contents are
solely
the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official
views of
CDC.
This report was prepared by Donna Bainbridge and Steve Seninger, copyright RTC:
Rural, 2004. The Rural Disability and Rehabilitation Research Report Series is
edited
by Diana Spas. This report is available in standard print, large print, Braille,
and as an
ASCII DOS text file on disk.
Montana Disability & Health Home Page | RTC: Rural | Rural Institute | The University of Montana | | Publications | Resource Directory