{"id":1558,"date":"2012-04-15T18:57:20","date_gmt":"2012-04-16T00:57:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/blog\/?page_id=1558"},"modified":"2012-05-29T19:53:55","modified_gmt":"2012-05-30T01:53:55","slug":"research-progress-report-21-description-of-table-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/?page_id=1558","title":{"rendered":"Research Progress Report #21 description of table 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1 align=\"left\">Research Progress Report #21<\/h1>\n<h5 align=\"left\"><span style=\"color: #888888;\">description of table 2<\/span><\/h5>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\">Pain treatments, ordered by efficacy ratings. 42 respondents had tried surgery. Surgery&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 5.55 and its standard deviation was 3.25. 100 respondents had tried prescription drugs. Prescription drugs&#8217; mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 4.99 and their standard deviation was 2.20. 41 respondents had tried massage. Massage&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 4.56 and its standard deviation was 2.23. 48 respondents had tried stress management. Stress management&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.81 and its standard deviation was 2.35. 67 respondents had tried pacing activities. The mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale for pacing activities was 3.76 and its standard deviation was 1.88. 46 respondents had tried physical therapy. Physical therapy&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.74 and its standard deviation was 1.98. 72 respondents had tried home-based exercise. Home-based exercise&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.67 and its standard deviation was 1.78. 79 respondents had tried non-prescription drugs. Non-prescription drugs&#8217; mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.62 and their standard deviation was 2.29. 28 respondents had tried herbal remedies. Herbal remedies&#8217; mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.57 and their standard deviation was 2.41. 52 respondents had tried lifting\/moving techniques. Lifting\/moving techniques&#8217; mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.52 and their standard deviation was 1.90. 10 respondents had tried facility-based exercise. Facility-based exercise&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 3.00 and its standard deviation was 2.21. Three respondents had tried acupuncture. Acupuncture&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 1.33 and its standard deviation was .577. End of description. <\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><a title=\"Research Progress Report #21 The Prevalence and Treatment of Pain\" href=\"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/blog\/?page_id=1552#T2\">Return to Text<\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial; font-size: small;\"><strong><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Research Progress Report #21 description of table 2 Pain treatments, ordered by efficacy ratings. 42 respondents had tried surgery. Surgery&#8217;s mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 5.55 and its standard deviation was 3.25. 100 respondents had tried prescription drugs. Prescription drugs&#8217; mean efficacy rating on the ten-point scale was 4.99 and their standard [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"parent":1552,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-1558","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1558\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtdh.ruralinstitute.umt.edu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}